ancientoneuk

Folks, for many years now I have been at the heart of some of the most amazing yet unbelievable things that have happened around this planet, these last few years I became privy to knowledge that I never knew existed, my paradigm shift was traumatic but once through I could see clearly, more clearly than for years.

Much of my work has been done from home or with others and to them I salute their tenacity to see things through to the end and yes they are looking good to happen, the trial of Tony Blair looks more promising every day and seeing that gutless traitor face the International Criminal Court will lead me to smile a small smile of victory as my part in that has been small.

But I am finding myself more and more embroiled in the fight against the lies of factions that support the murderous state of Israel, that more and more things are linked to one or the other and to be honest I am finding it hard work to keep up with the daily battles fought in the blogs and commentary sections.

I am also finding it hard not to comment on such as the holocaust where I do accept that the Nazi's did a lot of atrocious things, what I find equally unacceptable is the lies that have followed, the exaggeration of numbers, the increasing number of debunked "accounts" such as the holy grail of camp accounts e.g. Anne Franks where it has turned out it was written in a pen not available for many years during or after WWII.

No doubt Exec-CEO and Kodak321 (one and the same if I am any judge) will think they have won a victory here, never in my time have I seen two posters that like to spout such mendacious rubbish in the face of the facts, it is a pyrrhic victory to both as they have won nothing, in the end Israel will find as America collapses, itself bereft of any protection, the Russians want nothing to do with them nor the Chinese, the Europeans will throw some half hearted platituides their way but Israel will sometime in the next decade face the wrath of its neighbours and there won't be an America there to stop it.   Israel has wasted precious chances to wage peace instead of unjust war, it will not be forgotten as always the downtrodden sooner or later rise up and overwhelm their tormentors.

Part of this is also I say to myself... "If only they knew..." and despite mine and others best attempts at education of others, I realised that its not a case that they don't know, of course they bloody know and choose to live in denial, I knew within ten minutes of 7/7 that the government knew far far more than they were telling, I knew the Israeli's had more than an hour's warning that day too, once you see the pattern, you see the lies and you see that many things you took for granted were only to find out later to be staged, promulgated events designed to lead the people wherever the governments want them to go, hell HMS Ark Royal was scuttled in the Med as it had a million pounds worth of gilt propaganda, the ship could have been saved, could have been towed to Gibraltar but having it sunk by the German's was far more important to the government of that day as a unifying force of hatred against the Germans much in the same way that two skyscrapers have become that for another nation yet what they don't tell you are things like the fact that the training school where some of the pilots were trained being partially owned by Jeb Bush, with another Bush in charge of security at the complex that was attacked, the whole thing STINKS...

So what is the point of trying to reach out to people anymore, for years thanks to contacts in the US I tried to warn people that the economy was going to crash, people scoffed, people laughed and jeered but if they had listened, they could have saved themselves and so many now losing their jobs and homes...

So what promised to be an interesting blog, won't be carried on...   I am taking the blue pill and subsiding into the shadows.

And folks, it has been real, remember that they will lie to you, cheat you, do whatever they like with you and expect you to be grateful, I hope that one day a more modern Cromwell will rise from the ranks and challenge the system as it is, it is that day I look to for Britain and it will be that day I come out from the shadows one last time.

Ancient One UK... over and out.

Found an interesting post out there from the current New Hampshire sessions that is quite bold and indicates that the Union of the States is far from settled...

It would seem that independance movements in New Hampshire, Vermont, Hawaii and other states are gaining traction and that these states are seeking to break away from the main union and asserting themselves as independent states within the North American continent.

Hawaii is a slightly different ball game in that the lands of Hawaii were seized illegally but it is expected that New Mexico watching Hawaii closely will in due course also be making a statement of illegal confiscation and annexation too.

But New Hampshire itself is becoming more and more rebellious and the texts below indicate just how so by the tone aimed at the federal government.

And if the federal government does any of those things stated as not allowable in the statement from the legilature... how will NH react?

Anyway, enough of my ramblings.... here is the session statements.

HCR 6 – AS INTRODUCED

2009 SESSION

09-0274

09/01

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

SPONSORS: Rep. Itse, Rock 9; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Sen. Denley, Dist 3

COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

ANALYSIS

This house concurrent resolution affirms States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

09-0274

09/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and

Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, “First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;” and

Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and

Whereas these recommended changes were incorporated as the ninth amendment, the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, and the tenth amendment, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, to the Constitution for the United States of America; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, — delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress; and

That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory; and

That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitution, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;” and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against all abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press:” thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, and that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; and

That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,” and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof,” goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction; and

That a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolutions to the Legislatures of the several States; to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and union which it has manifested from that moment at which a common danger first suggested a common union: that it considers union, for specified national purposes, and particularly to those specified in their federal compact, to be friendly to the peace, happiness and prosperity of all the States: that faithful to that compact, according to the plain intent and meaning in which it was understood and acceded to by the several parties, it is sincerely anxious for its preservation: that it does also believe, that to take from the States all the powers of self-government and transfer them to a general and consolidated government, without regard to the special delegations and reservations solemnly agreed to in that compact, is not for the peace, happiness or prosperity of these States; and that therefore this State is determined, as it doubts not its co-States are, to submit to undelegated, and consequently unlimited powers in no man, or body of men on earth: that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the General Government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; but, where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non foederis), to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them: that nevertheless, this State, from motives of regard and respect for its co-States, has wished to communicate with them on the subject: that with them alone it is proper to communicate, they alone being parties to the compact, and solely authorized to judge in the last resort of the powers exercised under it, Congress being not a party, but merely the creature of the compact, and subject as to its assumptions of power to the final judgment of those by whom, and for whose use itself and its powers were all created and modified: that if the acts before specified should stand, these conclusions would flow from them: that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism — free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power: that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go. In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. That this State does therefore call on its co-States for an expression of their sentiments on acts not authorized by the federal compact. And it doubts not that their sense will be so announced as to prove their attachment unaltered to limited government, whether general or particular. And that the rights and liberties of their co-States will be exposed to no dangers by remaining embarked in a common bottom with their own. That they will concur with this State in considering acts as so palpably against the Constitution as to amount to an undisguised declaration that that compact is not meant to be the measure of the powers of the General Government, but that it will proceed in the exercise over these States, of all powers whatsoever: that they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the General Government, with a power assumed to bind the States, not merely as the cases made federal, (casus foederis,) but in all cases whatsoever, by laws made, not with their consent, but by others against their consent: that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority; and that the co-States, recurring to their natural right in cases not made federal, will concur in declaring these acts void, and of no force, and will each take measures of its own for providing that neither these acts, nor any others of the General Government not plainly and intentionally authorized by the Constitution, shall be exercised within their respective territories; and

That the said committee be authorized to communicate by writing or personal conferences, at any times or places whatever, with any person or person who may be appointed by any one or more co-States to correspond or confer with them; and that they lay their proceedings before the next session of the General Court; and

That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.

Catching a a rare glimpse of the anger that Gaza has brought out in the people of Britain, the video below just shows how things are getting for the citizens of the UK...

Below is a video that shows that people are really angered with government, the state and what is being done to them, yet it was only the sheer fact that the police were so outnumbered that this rare thing happened, if the numbers were more even, more in the police's favour it would be likely that ambulances would be carting protesters off by the truck load.


Yet there is a double standard at work here, the British law, despite the illegal changes made by Blair, allow for the freedom of expression, the freedom to protest, the freedom of free speech, the strong arm of the law here doesn't look like it intended to allow this to happen, where you have to book appointments to protest and they make it incredibly difficult to express yourself.

However, I myself have been a victim in the past of the good ol' priviilige of having my head kicked in by our police and despite the fact that I am a law abider and believe in such tenets of justice and law or order, my younger side remembering the unwarranted beatings from the Met was gladdened to see the roles reversed.

Too long have the police acted above the law in my mind and this video should be regarded as a warning to the government that the people are becoming more and more emboldened and it would have taken a very very small trigger in this film as you will see, to actually turn that protest that is somewhat rowdy and boisterous into an all out riot.

I cast my mind back though to the early eighties, when "sus" was rampant, the police given a free rein by Thatcher, Whitelaw encouraging a more brutal state, then a black man was allegedly according to some sources kicked to death in Brixton police station, the police instead of dealing with it and making it a criminal inquiry, decided to stick its jaw out and do nothing except provoke and taunt the local black community of Brixton, a week later much of that part of south London was in flames and the government was sat there with a horrified rictus collectively that such a thing should happen here in the UK.

The fact was, the Met were exceptionally brutal, many a drunk and disorderly felt the truncheon in the kidneys, my first encounter of this was at the age of thirteen, walking down a street in south London, never been in trouble, a van pulls up, officers jump out, throw me in the back and give me a working over... to this day I do not know why this happened, my late mother working at the Mail and the Times at this point created hell at Scotland Yard over this and she met the blue wall of silence...  It was not the last incident and continued for many years until I fought back after leaving the marines and I gave a lot better than I received.

Whilst those policemen and women in the film are not the same that did what they did, you still see the same actions, a policeman punches a protester in the face which is not acceptable, he will never be charged, disciplined or reprimanded even for as we saw at Stockwell, in Hackney, Forest Gate and even that traffic copper, the police are ABOVE the law.

Think about the least of the examples...  A traffic police officer whilst not on official duties is clocked doing 159mph on the motorway... you or me, its 3 years ban easily, massive fine and more, he gets acquitted, this is not right, it matters not that he is trained to drive that fast, I was trained on the Army's far superior special forces pursuit courses and I doubt if I were caught doing those sort of speeds that the magistrate would use that as a means for an acquittal, heck no, I would get a ban like everyone else.

Lets take Forest Gate, the incident where the police acting on bad tip offs, smashed their way into a house and shot an unarmed Muslim man... the first move of the Met was to immediately start to close it down and cover it up, not apologise and make amends, oh no and when public opinion was still not behind the state, the police "leaked" to the press that this Muslim man was now a child pornography suspect... instant smear bringing a massive swing of public opinion behind the police.

Again, with the Brazilian slaughtered on the tube... when it was looking bad for the police and their lies were falling apart, what ho, the police leak to the press that Menendes was a suspected rapist.

And of course, from Brixton to today, there is no independent inquiry, all inquiries are handled by the very corrupt IPCC, run by the police, for the police, an organisation that has possibly ruined up to 30 murder inquiries, only not called that because the person that did it has a badge.

The badge is not however a "disobey whatever laws I like" pass, the police are subject to EXACTLY the same laws as you and I, arrest is only a faction of common law so how comes so many of them get away with... murder literally?

Judging by the mood of this protest though, it seems people are not scared so much of the police as they may have been a couple of years ago, their anger overcoming their law abidance, good citizens having enough of corrupt governance, corrupt state control, watching the fat cats walk away with millions as they lose their jobs and houses, their families and livelhoods.

In the film V for Vendetta, V tells his protege that all it will take is a catalyst to start the reaction and the film above shows this in stark reality.

The government has two choices in front of it for the future, one that being to continue down the path of the totalitarian state and into dictatorship, or two, to step back from the abyss and work with the people and to stop oppressing them.

Of course we have a government that seems to be under the control of not one but two foreign powers, both America and Israel have far far too much say in what us British do, until we get honest politicians in office, then how can we reform the rest of the nation?

If Gordon Brown and nuLabour continue on their path that they have set themselves, all they are going to do is drive Britain into civil uprising and possibly civil war, the people are heartily sick to the eyes of nuLabours quasi-Nazi policies and if Brown wants to revisit the same scenarios that Thatcher watched in horror, then the best thing he can do is continue to act like a benign dictator.

People should not be afraid of their government, government should be afraid of its people, the film shows that in very vivid detail...

It seems to me that "democracy" here in the UK has somewhat dmiinished and wonder where Britain is heading for as yet more and more Orwellian edicts are brought in by the government and the British people seem to blithely sleepwalk right into a real life version of 1984.

ID cards, National Identity Register, RIPA, Echelon I & II.... Vague names that do not do justice to their power over the people of Britain but Hm Government has spent billions of taxpayers money to be used as weapons against the taxpayer in the name of "security", in reality it is not security but a mixture of bilking money from the taxpayers using scare stories alongside a more sinister agenda of a statist government intent on being master to the people instead of a servant of the people.

Information:

The British government craves information, what this government doesn't tell you though is what it does with it.   Firstly, the government likes to share information on you with its "friends", you would be very very surprised to know that you likely exist on many countries databases through its "sharing" network such as Echelon.

Secondly, this government likes to sell your information, anyone that has tried to sell a car on eBay will have noticed that when they input the registration details into the page, all the details instantly appear.   Not so sinister it would seem but eBay don't list your name and address even though they have those too, the government sold wholesale access to DVLA a few years back and it is abused by many companies.

Experian and Equifax also gather information on British people that is shared and sold around the world, every time you make a credit application, the company that you apply through will use one of these services to "credit check" you, it is a two way process and both these companies will suck your information in and then sell it on to whoever wants it and is willing to pay, Equifax has been suspected also of selling British information in the US which is not allowed under the EU SafeHarbor treaty, we are not talking about names and addresses but anything can be had from bank details to national insurance numbers.

ID Cards:

ID cards are doomed to be an abysmal failure and is viewed by a great majority of Britons as a plastic poll tax with little or no merit as a tool against terrorism or crminal behaviour as the Government claims, the people are being asked to pay £93 for the "privilige" of being forced to own one and once you do, the government has a great raft of tools to criminalise you if you lose one, fail to update it quickly, allow it to fall into the hands of someone else.

We are told it is not compulsory but then they quietly forget to mention at the Home Office that if you want to open a bank account, you will need one, if you want to get a prescription you will need one, claim child benefit... the list is very large in what we will need this inland passport for, the governments view is that you can always do without child benefit, prescriptions and bank accounts, no one is forcing you to take medicine or get milk tokens for your child...

But the system is flawed before it gets going, the RFID chips have been very quickly hacked, it has been shown that these cards can be scanned by "brush" encounters with a criminal, they can even be reprogrammed in a flash if that was the desire, they are NOT secure in any shape of the word.

Yet what the government isn't telling people and this is a biggie, is that this little wonder will report back to whoever is watching on your activity, it is likely that when you get your prescription that some sort of scan will take place to "verify" your card, this in turn will operate your file to be flagged with this new information and suddenly the government knows a lot more about you, something they do not have the right to either.

National Identity Register:

This is the big brother database, that will track every person in the UK with their details, will link serpentine to every other government and even some corporate databases, it in the right hands would be the key to your lives literally, if you exist outside of the database you will be an outcast, unable to access services, it is possibly the most sinister of government acts in British history as its depth of surveillance on you will be deep indeed.

The eyes and ears of this monstrosity will be the 4m CCTV's, the scanners on the underground you swipe your Oyster card into, the automatic registration plate cameras operating on our roads, the biometric facial recognition profiles that will be attached to every public CCTV, more and more council and government databases will be connected to this in time, every time you draw out a book, it will know and record this, every time you visit a doctor, it will know about this and store that information for other use... it is a very scary thing to have in our country.

But... its not the first...

In 1937, Thomas Watson of IBM Corp went to Germany and using IBM tabulating machines built Adolf Hitler a virtually identical database.   Hitler used this to great effect allowing his minions to seek out those of Jewish, Gypsy or other undesireable racial content, it was able to highlight habitual criminals, homosexuals, indeed it could be used tailor searches against people very very effectively.

IBM have always resisted their part in what happened after selling Hitler their machines and database but in short, the German national database made it very very easy for Hitler and the Nazi's to sweep up large swathes of people and of course we know what happened to a great many of them, they were killed.

Could this happen in the UK?  Well, yes it could for the government has two means of identifying religion alone, one being the religion entry on the card and database, the other is through simple genetics which can identify black, asian, white and mixed race people simply by examining the DNA profile.

Bearing in mind the governments rather rabid attituide towards Muslims, the unemployed, immigrants etc, its not such a great leap that if the government decided to move against these people en masse, the NIR would greatly assist it, indeed with the tracking capability aspect of the NIR, like the Nazi's it would simply be a shopping list of people to be picked up and moved into the state's mechanisms.

In conclusion...

For myself, I feel every concerned that our government, in our name and using our taxes is intent on bringing in tools of dictatorship.

ID cards have failed to stop any terrorism, this was seen in Bali and Madrid, the very fact too that government IT projects are viewed as unstable and unsafe leaves me with the thought that there are criminals out there rubbing their hands in glee at the potential harvest soon to be in their grasp.

There are concerns too that through Echelon I & II, our information is being shared with America, Israel, Australia, Canada with little or no guarantees or protections, bearing in mind the full spectrum surveillance aspect of this alone could lead to Briton's being placed at risk if deemed to be considered a threat to economic or security aspects of any of the sharees, this isn't as far fetched as people may think either as both the CIA and a joint DTi/MI6 have "economic warfare and destruction" units and I do remember an expose on Channel 4 highlighting the work of these units who wage war in foreign lands to remove competition for expanding British and American businesses and it was feted that these units have smeared and destroyed the business reputations of many a foreign businessman.

Lastly, it has to be reminded here to of the illegal activity committed by the British and American governments through GCHQ and Menwith Hall, in short they listen to nearly every phone call made in the northern hemisphere, not physically but using keywords to identify and refine their searches, the claim is it is for "security" (that word again) but in reality they are also tapping into business deals and gathering dirt on people that they might need to lean on sometime in the future, using this methodology American and British governments are able to give the "insider" information to those that want it and if you google out there, you will come across a surprising amount of people who are angered because their patents have been stolen, business deals pre-empted or leaked, this is the work of Menwith Hall at its best.

Yet these are still the tools of the dicator, combine that with a corrupt police system, corrupt governance, social divides widening every day, the dumbing down of the masses by intent...  whichever way you dress it up, its still one small step to falling into a dictatorial abyss,  we are verging on that cliff edge right now and unless our government takes a step back from this brink then we are in trouble.

And then the clock will strike thirteen...

Reports emerged today of a tragedy that killed 30 Palestinians forced to take shelter within a house in Gaza by the Israeli forces.

According to the BBC, 100 people were forced to take shelter within a house and less than 24 hours later, this shelter was repeatedly shelled by the Israeli's killing 30, many of whom where children.

On the face of it, this could be construed as some sort of bumbling mistake by an over-excited military but this is not the first time this has been seen in action.

The SS and Nazi Police Kommando Units involved in the cleansing of such as Warsaw, used a very similar tactic, forcing large amounts of Jews to take shelter and then destroying that building, for the German's it saved time and were able to keep large amounts of people cowed through fear allowing them to more effectivly do their dastardly work.

If this were the only evidence of such from the Israeli's, then I would be inclined to believe that "a tactical error" was made but on the face of it, however you look at it, Israel's actions and behaviours are more like the SS proving only a close second to American forces in action.

But Gaza is a Kz camp, it is a death camp, it is for the Israeli's like shooting fish in a barrel and to the average Israeli through his or her rabid indoctrination, about as emotional to them as well seeing that generations of Israeli's have been brought up that Palestinians, indeed the rest of the world are little more than scum, vermin, servitors to suit their needs and wants, Israeli's feel the same way about squashing insects as they do about killing Palestinians.

There is little that decent people can do except protest as loudly as possible on the behalf of the Gazans, boycott Israeli goods and services and educate those to the atrocity that is going on in the Middle East, Israel has learned too much at the teat of the Nazi's, like the abused victim, they in turn have become abusers themselves and need restraining...

OK, in at the deep end and it is one of my most major concerns but I wonder why after 70 odd years since World War II ended that we have such a large and rather dominating American presence not only here in the UK but around Europe as well in regions too that are leastwise low on a threat potential from the old Soviet Union.

Yet for quite a few years, communities in Italy and elsewhere in Europe, have stated that they do not want new bases and speaking of the Italians alone, they want the current US base closed down, in short they want the Americans to go home.

Polls further eastward indicate that the greater majority of Czechs and Poles do not want US bases on their territory and they certainly are not happy whatsoever in hosting Bush's Missile Defence System elements on their territory as rightly pointed out by the Russians, that if they did intercept a "rogue" nuclear weapon, Poland for sure would see radiological fallout across its realm which could spread across neighbouring countries.

A comment should be made here in regards to these so-called democracies it seems the will of the people is of little concern when it comes to kow-towing to American overlordship.

Yet this indicates what America wants, it sees at some time in the future a conflict with Russia in a power struggle and has absolutely no intention of allowing a major conflict to erupt on America's mainland and is quite happy for any future wars to be theatred here in Europe.

In regards to this, Bush has assured various leaders that his missile defence system works well and is guaranteed yet this is a lie because as has been seen in the news late last year, the interceptors only succeeded in extremely biased conditions and American systems have a track record of being unreliable at best, indeed Patriot has a high failure rate even now and still nations place their security on such.

But America has rather a sinister agenda if viewed by the Europeans in regards to the theatre of war, by forcing any conflict with Russia into the Eurozone, it buys America several options, one not least being half an hour warning before missiles hit the US but it would matter little to America if Europe was turned into a nuclear wasteland as long as America survives and there is a contingency that hopes Russia would be sated in destroying elements known as "disposables" e.g. US bases specifically placed to draw Russia's fire and if it looked bad then the US would seek "peace" but if it looked good, could move towards a decisive strike against Russia from its nuclear submarine fleet, either way Europe, America's allies lose out, America has more chance to survive and in doing so allows it the flexibility to attempt to win a nuclear war which President Bush believes can be done.

However, what the Americans are not factoring into their calculations is that Russia, according to the Pentagon in mid 2008 has possibly a 15 year lead on the US in several military technologies, Russia has always seemed weaker than it is to its enemies and has used this to its merit when Hitler thought he had Russia beat only to be overwhelmed when Russia unleashed its main force against the Germans ulitmately winning WWII in the process.

The other aspect of this, is that Europe as a community has been hamstrung in its attempts to build a cohesive military force, bearing in mind that the EU could field a formidable land and sea force if allowed to, leaders are forced to rely on US bases and dwindling US power projection, with the credit crunch it may be seen that this could work against us here in the EU simply as America's economy collapses, like all empires, will lead to the recall of its overseas forces and there suddenly in Europe will exist a power vacuum that the Russia's would be stupid not to exploit.

Europe is more than capable of its own defence and should be doing so, there is no reason why we cannot continue as allies supporting each other in dire need but the borders of the US are across the Atlantic ocean and as far as Europe is concerned that is where American military influence should stretch to, currently Europe is a de facto dominion of Washington whether militarily or economically, we should be asserting ourselves in our own affairs and not wait for policy to be set by a foreign power.

In the long run, it would benefit not only the EU but the US who with a much relieved military budget could find its burden on the taxpayer somewhat alleviated, the EU has great potential as a global bloc and this is feared too by the US who would think they would be left behind by an emergent EU, again being independent does not mean we can not be friends and allies, it just means we are independent and decide things for ourselves as a priority and not second or third place behind America's needs.

I would like to see Europe more independent, it has great potential to do good on this planet and whilst the EU leadership has its issues of corruption, is far far less corrupt and subservient to the corporation than America's political system is.

This is my first post and I know that I will make some friends in here, possibly more enemies though but you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs in my mind, I do not intend to cause offence to anyone in particular.... just need to see that the truth is there regardless of whether people like it or not.

I am an impassioned believer in justice, in truth, in causes and beginnings, I have been likened to a consiparacy theorist many times but I consider myself a conspiracy analyst and thanks to enlightenment by many people around me, consider myself somewhat knowledgeable on the ways and means of things that really happened, not the pre-cut, pre-formatted propagandic versions that we are so used to seeing.

I am also an impassioned believer in empowering others to take themselves forward, to fight for justice, for peace, for what is right against what is wrong and this will likely be seen as a running vein throughout my posts.

But despairing at what I see as collective stupidity by the people's here in the west, this is an attempt, like so many other clamouring voices to make a little of the truth be known, hopefully if enough people read what I write, it will spark debate, thought and consideration of the other viewpoints out there, if anything I write makes people stop and think, then my job is done...